<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallelizing RSYNC Processes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sun3.org/archives/280/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sun3.org/archives/280</link>
	<description>Rob Thompson&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:42:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Thompson &#187; Zimbra Backup Replication with RSYNC</title>
		<link>http://sun3.org/archives/280/comment-page-1#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Thompson &#187; Zimbra Backup Replication with RSYNC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sun3.org/?p=280#comment-342</guid>
		<description>[...] almost impossible to do this with any version of RSYNC before version 3. For more about this, see the post I did a few years ago. Since then, RSYNC has introduced a life-saving feature (&#8220;&#8211;recursive&#8221;). This is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] almost impossible to do this with any version of RSYNC before version 3. For more about this, see the post I did a few years ago. Since then, RSYNC has introduced a life-saving feature (&#8220;&#8211;recursive&#8221;). This is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best way to backup and restore millions of files Drija</title>
		<link>http://sun3.org/archives/280/comment-page-1#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Best way to backup and restore millions of files Drija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sun3.org/?p=280#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] you tried splitting the backup into multiple rsync processes as per Parallelizing RSYNC Processes? This will put more load onto your CPU and IO so you need to test how many simultaneous rsync [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you tried splitting the backup into multiple rsync processes as per Parallelizing RSYNC Processes? This will put more load onto your CPU and IO so you need to test how many simultaneous rsync [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

